Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

Blog

TAB VEE

The first aboveground hardened shelters were built by the United States Marine Corps (USMC) at Ewa Field, Oahu, beginning in September 1942. Made of reinforced concrete and covered with soil and plants, the shelters offered excellent protection from anything other than a direct bomb hit or head-on strafing run. Because of their clamshell design, the width and length shrinks as one moves up the side of the shelter, and height drops as one moves toward the rear. Thus this design would not be appropriate for larger aircraft with tricycle landing gear, but the design was fine for USMC tail-dragging aircraft, such as the Grumman F6F Hellcat, Grumman F4F Wildcat, and Vought F4U Corsair fighters. These shelters measured 18 feet high and 55 feet wide (floor level) in front and 39 feet deep. Concrete facing was roughly 3 feet high with 12 to 18 inches of concrete protection overall.

U.S. Marine Corps Concrete Fighter Shelter, November 25, 1944, Ewa Field, Oahu (Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR900/RR968/RAND_RR968.pdf)

Initially tied to the war in Vietnam, various elements of the Air Staff, including the Directorate of Civil Engineering, began formal studies by mid-1962 “relative to protection of fighter-type aircraft on overseas bases”. As the program matured, the usefulness of a hardened aircraft shelter became obvious to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the first field studies were conducted at Bitburg, Germany. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mediterranean Division begun taking steps as part of the Theater Air Base Vulnerability Evaluation Exercise (TAB VEE), program. Stemming from this program, Army engineers designed and constructed aircraft shelters that used reinforced concrete poured over liners made of corrugated-steel arches. In early 1969, the Mediterranean Division received authorization to design and build maintenance and parking hangers for the Air Force at Aviano in Italy and Incirlik in Turkey. Paralleling TAB VEE, the Air Force inaugurated a program refined specifically for Vietnam entitled Concrete Sky. The result of these effort produced first and second generation Protective Aircraft Shelters (PAS) to shield aircraft from conventional weapons as well as indirect nuclear attack and resulting overpressures.

Prototype shelters from Concrete Sky I & II (Retrieved from Keeping the Edge: Air Force Materiel Command Cold War Context (1945-1991) – Volume II: Installations and Facilities, p.166)

As of 1974-1976, all efforts turned toward true hardening. A third generation program, DISTANT RUNNER, was underway simultaneously with upgrading TAB VEE first-generation shelters at bases all over the world. DISTANT RUNNER involved multiple classified tests on the Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR) and at several locations in New Mexico.

In 1976 a Sandia National Laboratory study to determine the best way to safeguard U.S. Air Force nuclear weapons deployed abroad led to the establishment of the Weapon Storage and Security System (WS3) program that would later be tested as part of the DISTANT RUNNER program. As this hardened storage system would mature, the newly formed Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) would work with NATO on the PACOM Tactical Nuclear Force improvement program which was implemented in the early 1980s to begin upgrading the security of nuclear weapons.

(Retrieved from Keeping the Edge: Air Force Materiel Command Cold War Context (1945-1991) – Volume II: Installations and Facilities, p.266)

After members of DNA were appointed as permanent members of the NATO High Level Group, which dealt with Theater Nuclear Forces, they pushed for the formation, and to lead, the Senior Level Weapons Protection Group (SLWPG) to address the security and survivability of nuclear weapons deployed to NATO countries. The DNA Deputy Director for Operations headed the U.S. delegation to the new group, which was instrumental in the installation of WS3 throughout NATO.

Part of WS3, is the Weapon Storage Vault (WSV), this is an underground vault located in the floor of a hardened aircraft shelter. A WSV holds up to four weapons and provides ballistic protection in the lowered position through its hardened lid and reinforced sidewalls. The United States calls the entire system the Weapon Storage and Security System (WS3), whereas NATO refers to it as the Weapons Security and Survivable System (WS3) . The first of these vaults were completed in Buchel Air Base, Germany in August of 1990 and would continue across various NATO airbases until 1998.

At least one Mk57 & Mk61 inside a Weapon Storage Vault (WSV), part of the Weapon Storage and Security System (WS3) used to secure nuclear weapons outside the continental U.S. (OCONUS) (Retrieved from https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ep-iEtjXEAAtDSF?format=jpg&name=large)

USAFE TAB VEE; 24-feet radius semicircular arch, 48 feet wide by 100.8 feet long, front closure prow shaped, vertically hinged, recessed door.

First Generation Aircraft Shelter (TAB VEE Modified); 24-feet radius semicircular arch, 48 feet wide by 100.8 feet long, front closure prow shaped, laterally opening, external flush door.

Second Generation Aircraft Shelter; 29.4-feet double-radius, pseudo-elliptical arch, 82 feet wide by 124 feet long, vertical reinforced concrete panel, laterally opening, sliding, external flush door.

Third Generation Aircraft Shelter; 27.4-feet double-radius, pseudo-elliptical arch, 70.8 feet wide by 120 feet long, vertical reinforced concrete panel, laterally opening, sliding, external flush door. Personnel door at one side with barricade.

Korean TAB VEE; 24-feet radius semicircular arch, 48 feet wide by 100.8 feet long, open front. Exhaust port in rear wall protected only by a blast deflector barricade (otherwise identical to USAFE TAB VEE). When hardened doors are installed, consider these shelters as TAB VEE Modified.

Korean Flow-Through; Constructed from third generation drawing but omits front door, back wall, and personnel door, 70.8 feet wide by 120 feet long, 27.4-feet double-radius, pseudo-elliptical arch.

Hellbender

It’s so fascinating, seeing the testing that is involved in the development of a weapon system or even a single component to bolster a strategic goal. I was not disappointed when I discovered a report covering the Hellbender and Mk11 series. This was a series of six tests that had the purpose of evaluating the ability of a Mk61 Mod 7 (B61-7) to serve as an interim solution to an Earth-Penetrating Weapon (EPW).

Although Department of Energy Laboratories were already involved in the development of a high-performance Strategic Earth Penetrator Weapon (SEPW), the defense community expressed an interest, in November 1986, in modifying an existing stockpile weapon for less coast and more immediate use. Buried installations had been identified in the Soviet Union that were not easily challenged by weapons in the current stockpile.

The series was six tests, four of these tests were conducted as simple drop tests and were given the “Hellbender” designator from Los Alamos National Laboratory. The other two were configured around a potential delivery vehicle and were designated as Mk-11 tests.

A Hellbender II Test Unit (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)
A Hellbender III Test Unit, suspended under a CH-53 Helicopter (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

Starting on January 27th, 1987, the first test was to demonstrate that, with minimal structural modifications, the Mk61-7 gravity bomb could survive and function as a penetrator weapon. The specific test was judged to be the minimum levels that would be useful for an interim EPW, consisting of impacting the Mk61-7 into a moderately hard soil at a suitable velocity for penetration and energy coupling. Although the Mk61-7 was built for low-altitude, high-speed drops on hard irregular targets, it cannot survive earth penetration environment without modification, to realize this test, it was modified to accept a steel nosecone in place of the standard energy-absorber radar nose. The energy-absorber nose would create an unacceptable blunt shape for earth-penetration, the penetrator nose was a conical and machined from a heat-treated billet of HP-9-4-20 steel, with a special cavity machined also for a special data recorder to record the impact environment. This steel was selected over other available materials because of its high strength and fracture toughness. The nose was designed to adapt to the aluminum center case with two tape joints. Two parallel joints were required for optimum strength because radial clearance was limited. The parachute system was also removed with the tail section modified to accommodate vertical suspension from the underside of a helicopter. The test unit was then dropped, free-fall onto a dry lack bed known as Antelope Lake at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR).

Although many of the perceived underground targets could be held at risk with a soil penetrating weapon, a second test was created to demonstrate the utility of the Mk61 against the same targets during the winter season (potential buried Soviet installation). The parameters for the other tests were therefore chosen to simulate the environment that a weapon would encounter when impacting a deeply frozen-soil target. A very hard location at TTR known as Brown’s Lake was selected as the simulated frozen target. Although the dry lake bed was not actually frozen during the test, terradynamic calculations showed that it was considerably harder to penetrate than a typical soil target frozen to a depth of 6 feet.

This test would increase the velocity which required it to be dropped from a high-altitude at 17,000 feet, the requirement eliminated the use of a helicopter. As a result, the Mk61 was modified to be carried from a DOE Twin Otter aircraft, this style of delivery also decreased the penetration depth due to its angle of impact.

A Hellbender II Test Unit, A modified Mk61 Mod 7 with a steel nose, under a DOE Twin Otter aircraft (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)
Hellbender III impact site (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)
Hellbender IV impact site (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

The last test of the Hellbender series was the only test that actually incorporated the design that was preferred by LANL, an all-steel case. Up until this point, only the nose had been the steel penetrating component with the center case remaining aluminum. Obtained from Y-12 and Oak Ridge, it was machined from a solid billet of 4340 steel because the preferred HP-9-4-20 steel could not be procured to support any of the Hellbender tests.

A steel penetrator case procured by LANL from Y-12 and Oak Ridge for the Hellbender IV test, an interim Earth Penetrator Weapon series of tests for the Mk61-7 (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

Significantly different from the Hellbender tests, the two Mk-11 tests consisted of an air-drop and a rocket-boosted re-entry test. To fit inside the Mk-11C re-entry aeroshell, the conical steel-nose design had to be shortened about 6 inches. The new steel nose was filled with a 315lb depleted-uranium ballast for mass property consideration. The result was a slight ogive profile compared to the conical hellbender nose.

The standard Mk-11C aeroshell was modified slightly for this test, externally, the composite skin was machined down to the bare heat-shield for proper reentry simulation. Internally, the substructure was cleaned out to accept penetrator mounting features including a nose cup, a center case ring, and a rigid aluminum support cone. To provide area support for the Mk-11C shell, the void between the penetrator and the shell was filled with a dense polyurethane foam. The normal Mk-11C spin rockets were used for spin stabilization of the vehicle. The mating spacer section was attached to the test unit to accommodate parachute extraction from the cargo bay of the C-130 aircraft. Standard Mk-11C gas-actuated ball locks were used to attach the spacer to the reentry body.

Mk-11C aeroshell air-drop test unit (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

The second Mk-11C aeroshell was modified for a proper reentry simulation and penetrator mounting features. All new hardware was fabricated for mounting the penetrator inside the shell. A new in-flight telemetry was designed to accommodate unique rocket system functions. In addition to monitoring the same set of dynamics instrumentation, the circuitry was used to separate rocket motors, fire the second stage rocket, release the test vehicle, turn on the Mk61 electronics, initiate the impact recorder, and start a special flight stabilization device. The telemetry package also transmitted general diagnostic information and provided rocket-safing features, including an environmental-sensing switch. Due to instability seen in the air-drop test when the standard un-modified spin-stabilization system was used, a new stabilization system was developed. This stabilization device was called an Active Rate Reducer (ARR). It used high-pressure nitrogen to create counter thrust that would damp out instabilities during flight. It was delivered as a complete assembly from the missile contracting agency.

Mk-11C test vehicle mounted to the rocket (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)
Mk-11C test vehicle mounted to the rocket (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

The Mk-11C rocket test was launched into a ballistic trajectory using a Talos rocket motor. The second stage, improved Honest John rocket motor was fired several seconds after apogee to accelerate the payload to a realistic reentry velocity. The aft end of the Mk-11C aeroshell came to rest about 6 inches below the soil. This suggests that the aero structure did not remain attached to the payload very long and probably had a negligible effect on penetration performance.

Mk-11C impact site (Retrieved from Interim Earth-Penetrator Weapon Test Series, https://osf.io/46sfd/)

This was definitely an interesting find and makes me want to know more about the possibilities of a penetrator-type weapon being utilized with reentry vehicles. The overall conclusion of the tests was that the Mod 7 could, with slight modification, be used as an interim solution to their EPW problem, I’m very confident though that this would eventually lead to the Mod 11.

The Tableleg Committee

With early-warning systems getting more advanced in the 50s, Sandia National Laboratory’s Experimental Weapons Research Group was tasked with developing a “laydown” concept for weapons delivery and any other method that may allow a low-flying supersonic aircraft from escaping the blast. In late 1955, based on the studies of this group, a joint Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and Department of Defense (DOD) group was created in the form of the Tableleg Committee to pursue these methods for military application.

Two methods were carried into fruition, the first being an elaborate aircraft maneuver that might provide escape time: as it approached, a low-flying aircraft could pull up and lob its bomb in an arc toward the target, while the pilot looped the plane over and back toward safety. The second, parachutes, rotochutes, or retro-rockets on a bomb might retard its decent to the ground, slowing it to prevent its destruction at impact, thereby allowing a timer to delay detonation.

Nebulous

Still feeling overwhelmed by the shear amount of information and, if I’m still to pursue the original purpose of this site, how much work there is still left to do. My interaction with others on the topic of researching nuclear weapons has kept me motivated though, it seems many misconceptions are centered around information that just isn’t true. I’m hoping to mitigate that with extensive citing, which I’m hoping will also prompt more people to contact me to correct something if my source is incorrect. I’ve still been updating my notes on my home computer but the only page I’ve really updated on the site is the Milestones page. Cross-referencing documents to find which weapon system was testing in a particular operation is more difficult than I thought it would be.

Mountains of Information

Posted the site to Reddit today in a hope that it will be received well. Even though this is just a hobby, the more serious I get about the validity and accuracy of the information that I post, the more I feel obligated to work on it. It’s especially frustrating to see the tiny amount I’ve been able to release on the site in comparison to my OneNote document that has all of my notes in it. The website is like looking at a glacier, you only see a tiny amount of what I have collected but I don’t want to post it as I have it collected right now. I see it as being too raw, each weapons page is just a collection of random facts that I’ve thrown together from various sources so as I create a page for each weapon on the site I want to re-write it all into a legible page of a traceable timeline across the weapons history.

Posting the site onto Reddit was a huge personal milestone of mine since I’ve been working on this for the past 2 years but it just reminds me at how much work I still have to do! Not losing focus, just working the whole project to be more defined. Still very excited to see what this site will become!

Addicted to Context

I believe context has been what is slowing me down the most. Not knowing exactly where to start because everything had a part to play in wherever you think you should start. I start writing up something about a topic and realize that there was an event that predated where I wanted to start that affected the situation in which the topic I’m writing about started. I’m going to have to make very conscious decisions about where I’m starting and why. I believe I can still explain the entire picture of what I’m wishing to share but I will need to split it up into their own separate pages. Then, at least, the difficult part will be how to blend the pages together so that the reader can, relatively easily, follow the story across the various pages. I want it to be specific enough too so that someone can find a specific topic they wish to look into and be able to dive right into it without having to comb through tons of related material to get to it. We’ll see!

Get the boulder rolling

I’ve actually got a lot more positive feedback about even the small amount of information I’ve posted so far. I’m starting to get a better feel for turning the information I have into a more legible format so hopefully I’ll be able to start posting more information on weapons a little more quickly. With the weapons, it’s pretty easy because they’re easily identifiable and other than small overlaps in their development programs, their histories are pretty straight forward and easy to trace. Attempting to trace the history of entire laboratories, personnel associated with those, and other testing facilities are going to be a little more difficult because of the shear amount of material they cover. Still excited though, not burnt out so I’ll just keep plugging away at this!

Iceberg

I don’t know how, deciding to move my notes onto a web-page has made this all so much more difficult than I thought it would be but it has. The moment I begin to work on a topic to solidify a page or a portion of a single topic, I find content that relates to another portion of the project and I get all excited and pursue that. Next thing I know, 4 hours later, I can’t even remember what topic I was on. I’m going to have to be much more deliberate in how I go about this or it’s going to take a very long time to get anywhere.

Under Development

First post! Pretty excited to get this up and running but it has solidified in my mind, just how difficult and daunting a task this is going to be. There’s so much information! An overwhelming amount and it’s all so exciting. When my interest in all of this started, I really had no idea how much was involved, I figured the Manhattan project was pretty large in scale and science involved but it really does pale to the enterprise it would transform into. I really hope this site turns into something that is able to be used as a useful resource for interested people!